All this seems too good to be true, and no wonder it is.
Many people recently have asked me about this and so I thought of posting my opinion/analysis here.
Though we still do not have performance results of these sort of ULIPs, I can safely assume that the insurance companies have a total say about the way investments are going to be made.
There are no objectives defined for the funds in those ULIPs
If you read the scheme offer carefully, its written that the insurance companies have total freedom to invest your money anywhere; Money Markets, Debt, equity etc. all the allocations being between 0% to 100%. Needless to say this lacks a clear objective.
Too much expense
For the first 3 years the expenses are about 10% to 40%. Might be different for different products. But, I wont want to pay 10% expenses for any fund management; and definitely not for a Money Market fund.
Poor Insurance
As with all the ULIPs the insured amount is very less. Most of the schemes I have seen it 's 5 times the annual premium paid.
With so many options and powers with the insurance companies, I would be surprised if they wont end up manipulating the NAV of the fund. In such a way that the final amount you get after 8 years would be according to the highest NAV, but they would have taken away a lot more from you in terms of management charges.
A rough calculation of the LIC Wealth Plus plan figures is below. Click on the image to see the details.

Further reading :
Jagoinvestor, in very simple terms, explains how the Dynamic Hedging and Constant proportion portfolio insurance methods works. I recommend you to read this http://www.jagoinvestor.com/2010/03/how-do-highest-nav-guarantee-plans-work.html
